Assault with a Deadly Weapon

Assault with a Deadly Weapon - California Penal Code Section 245

Assault with a deadly weapon, often referred to by its acronym "ADW," is a specific type of assault that carries harsher penalties for its commission. Specifically, when an assault is committed with any weapon or instrument that is capable of causing great bodily injury or death, the crime of assault with a deadly weapon has been committed. Many different things can be deadly weapons, not just knives and guns. In the case of firearms, however, the Penal Code imposes harsher penalties, and even harsher penalties still, depending on the type of firearm used. If the victim of an assault is a police officer or firefighter, particularly if they are engaged in the performance of their duties, the harshest penalties may be imposed.

What is Assault:

The crime of assault is defined by California Penal Code section 240, and provides that an assault is committed when a person makes an unlawful attempt to commit a violent injury on another person, coupled with a present ability to inflict that injury.

There are two basic elements to the crime of assault. The first is an unlawful attempt. This generally requires some type of physical action, not merely a spoken threat of violence. The second is a present ability to inflict a violent injury on another person. For example, an unarmed, frail, elderly person attacking a professional bodybuilder in their prime, would generally not be considered as having a present ability to inflict a violent injury. In that case, the former may be capable of inflicting a violent injury on themselves, but on the latter. 

Note that the crime of assault does not involve actually causing injury to another person, the crime is committed when the attempt is made, whether or not it succeeds. Should an assault result in an injury to another person, then a battery has been committed. Battery is a separate crime, which carries its own penalties.

However, while a person can be charged with assault without actually committing a battery, if a person does commit a battery, they will generally also be changed with assault.   

How Does Assault With a Deadly Weapon Differ From Assault:

In simplest terms, assault with a deadly weapon differs from a simple assault in that the assault is carried out with a "deadly weapon or instrument." The Penal Code does not specifically define the term "deadly weapon," but it is generally understood that a deadly weapon is any weapon or instrument that is inherently deadly (such as a gun or knife) or any object that is not inherently deadly, but is used in such a way (i.e., used as a weapon) that is it is likely to result in great bodily injury or death.

A good example of an object that is not inherently deadly, but is likely to result in great bodily injury or death if used as a weapon, is a hammer. When used for its proper purpose, a hammer can, and often does, result in injuries to hands, thumbs and fingers. However, none of those rise to the level of "great bodily injury." If, however, a hammer is used as a weapon, and is swung with force at another person's chest or head, great bodily injury or death is likely. In that case, a hammer could be considered a deadly weapon.

Another example of something that could be used as a deadly weapon is a motor vehicle. It goes without saying that cars and trucks are capable of killing someone. Accidental deaths involving motor vehicles are a daily occurrence across the country. If, however, a motor vehicle is used in an attempt to intentionally injure someone, the driver can be charged with assault with a deadly weapon

Virtually any object is capable of being considered a deadly weapon, depending on the way it is used, if it appears that the intent of the person using it was to inflict great bodily injury or death. However, the Penal Code does recognize a class of "less lethal" weapons in section 16780, which includes common self-defense weapons, such as pepper spray and stun guns.       

However, it is not necessarily required that a person use a weapon or other object to attack another person. The Penal Code provides that an assault committed "by any means of force likely to produce great bodily injury" then that person can be charged in a similar manner to that of a person who uses a deadly weapon.

Assault With a Deadly Weapon Does Not Actually Require Use of a Weapon:

It may sound strange that a person could be charged with assault with a deadly weapon, even if they did not use a weapon. While technically assault with a deadly weapon does indeed require the use of a weapon, when a person commits an assault without a weapon (i.e., an unarmed assault,) but uses any means of force likely to produce great bodily injury; the Penal Code treats that assault, essentially, as if it were committed with a weapon, imposing largely the same penalties.

The question here is whether the unarmed application of force by the defendant was likely to result in great bodily injury. As such, different factors will come into play, such as the age, size and mental and physical fitness of the defendant and the alleged victim, as well as any specialized training (such as self-defense or martial arts training) received by either the defendant or the alleged victim. If a court determines that given all the facts and circumstances surrounding the alleged assault, that the defendant acted to apply force sufficient to cause great bodily injury, then the defendant can be convicted, and suffer largely the same penalties as if they had committed an assault with a deadly weapon.  

How Does a Prosecutor Prove Assault With a Deadly Weapon:

For the Defendant to be found guilty, there are the facts (also known as elements) that must be shown:

(1) An act committed by the defendant, which by its activity, would most likely result in the force being applied to another person;

(2) The defendant performed the act with a deadly weapon, or the act was such that it would result in force that was likely to produce "great bodily injury:"

(3) The Defendant intended his actions;

(4) In acting as he did, the accused should have known facts that if known by a reasonable person would lead to the belief that his or her act would most likely result in force being applied to another; and

(5) When the defendant committed the act, he or she had the means to apply force with a deadly weapon, or force likely to produce great bodily injury.

Aggravating Circumstances:

There are generally three different circumstances that worsen, or aggravate, an assault with a deadly weapon charge. These circumstances tend to prompt the prosecutor to seek more severe penalties when bringing charges.

(1) If the assault results in great bodily injury, meaning it resulted in a serious injury to the victim; then the prosecutor is more likely to charge the assault as a felony, and seek more severe penalties.

(2) If the assault was committed against a police officer, firefighter or individuals in other, similar professions, particularly if the assault occurred while they were performing their official duties; the charges are likely to be more severe.

(3) If a firearm was used in the assault, it is highly likely the assault will be charged as a felony, with enhanced penalties if the type of firearm was a semiautomatic, fully automatic or assault weapon.   

Penalties:

Assault with a deadly weapon is a type of crime commonly known as a wobbler. Meaning it can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. The type of treatment it receives depends on the circumstances surrounding the crime.

Different factors, such as the type of weapon used and the injuries, if any, sustained by the victim, are all considered by the prosecutor, who then decides whether to proceed with misdemeanor or felony changes.

A misdemeanor can result in the following penalties:

(1) Informal probation for a period of three years.;

(2) One year in local confinement; and/or

(3) A one thousand dollar ($1000) fine.

A felony can result in the following penalties:

(1) Formal probation (with a probation officer) for up to five years;

(2) Two (2), three (3) or four (4) years in state prison; and/or

(3) Ten thousand dollars ($10,000) in fines.

Additionally, if great bodily injury occurs there may be an enhancement of 3 additional years in prison. If the weapon used was a motor vehicle, a conviction can result in a life-time driver's license suspension.

The nature of the victim of the assault can also result in additional penalties and increased prison time. Increased penalties are prescribed for assaults involving Police officers, firemen, traffic enforcement officers and a number of other occupations.

The use of certain weapons, particularly, semiautomatic firearms, machine guns and assault weapons also carry stricter penalties. Up to nine (9) years in prison can be imposed for use of a semiautomatic firearm, and as much as twelve (12) years in prison can be imposed for use of a machine gun or assault weapon.  

Defenses:

Not having used a deadly weapon or not having used force likely to cause great bodily injury:

In determining whether an object or weapon should be considered a deadly weapon, the court will look to both the typical uses of the object or weapon, as well as the manner in which it was used by the defendant. In the case of an object not normally used as a weapon, it may be possible to show that the way it was used in the assault was not likely to cause great bodily injury. If it's the case that the object is inherently a weapon, the assault with a deadly weapon charge could possibly be defended on the basis that the weapon is not inherently deadly, such as with pepper spray or a stun gun, and that the manner in which it was used was not likely to result in great bodily injury.

If someone punches another person, it is generally not likely that the force will be sufficient to cause great bodily injury.  However if someone was to punch another person, take them to the ground, and then proceed to kick them repeatedly, the force would be sufficient to inflict great bodily injury. Similarly, if a person has had specialized martial arts, or similar, training, and they commit an unarmed assault; that person could be charged as if they did possess a deadly weapon.

In defending against a charge of this nature, it may be possible to show that the person who committed the assault was not physically capable of inflicting great bodily injury, or to the extent that it was possible, it was unlikely. Any type of physical limitation or pre-existing condition could be useful in defending against the charge.

Self-defense or Defense of Others:

The Defendant must believe, and the belief must be reasonable, that they or a third party  were about to be physically harmed by someone else, and the level of force they used to prevent that physical harm was commensurate to the threat; then they would not be guilty of the offense.

Lack of Intent:

If the prosecuting witness had an unreasonable belief that the accused intended to threaten or strike the prosecuting witness, the charge may be defensible.  The witness may have had a belief that was not reasonable that the accused would strike them.

Actual Case:

Johnny G was at a party with his girlfriend.  A group of guys were standing around Johnny and were getting very rowdy. Johnny bumped into one of the guys and the man challenged Johnny to a fight. Johnny declined and he and his girlfriend left the party. As Johnny and his girlfriend drove away, they were surrounded by the group of guys.  Johnny picked up a pair of brass knuckles that he had in the back of his car, walked up to the ring-leader, and socked the guy in the eye.  Johnny broke the guy’s occipital bone.  Johnny was charged with assault with a deadly weapon, the brass knuckles, and with inflicting great bodily injury. Johnny faced seven years in prison.  I was able to convince the D.A. that Johnny was rightfully defending himself and his girlfriend and the D.A. reduced the charges to misdemeanor charge of possession of a deadly weapon with no jail time. After he completed probation Johnny was able to get his conviction expunged.

What We Can Do To Assist You:

We have been aggressively fighting for the rights of the criminally accused for over forty years.  David Foos started out as a Deputy Public Defender where he represented clients on every sort of crime from misdemeanors to murders. David built a reputation as a hard-fighting, hard-charging advocate that would push his clients’ interests to the max.  David took many cases to jury trial and achieved very good results for his client.  After, David served as a judicial officer for the Sacramento Superior Court for sixteen years.  David sat on the bench and heard every sort of case including criminal cases and civil matters.  David gained a reputation as a fair jurist that was concerned about the right of people that came before him and had empathy for their problems.  After his stint as a Court Commissioner, David went into private practice, where he has been representing clients in the criminal courts for the last eleven years.  David enjoys a good relationship with opposing lawyers from the D.A.’s office as well as with the Judges of the various courts.  David will use his relationships and knowledge to get you excellent results in your case.  Contact David at 916-779-3500 or by email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Your first me


Know Your Rights

All submissions are confidentially reviewed by an attorney at Foos Gavin Law Firm.

Areas of Service